arXiv:2605.29659v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Real-time safety filtering for large language model (LLM) applications requires classifiers that can detect unsafe prompts, toxic language, jailbreak attempts, and unsafe responses without the cost profile of large guardrail models, and that can distinguish benign sensitive text from genuinely covert harmful content. In this paper, we introduce Opir, a family of encoder-based guardrail models built on the GLiClass architecture. Opir includes multi-task models for binary safe/unsafe classification, multi-label toxicity classification, jailbreak classification, and zero-shot unsafe prompt and response categorization. We also release edge variants with fewer than 100M parameters dedicated to binary safe/unsafe categorization. The models are trained on a three-level taxonomy containing 996 categories across 16 top-level labels, 126 mid-level labels, and 854 leaf labels. Opir's training data combines taxonomy-grounded unsafe prompts, adversarially mined hard negatives, benign safety-preserving examples, generated response examples, multilingual translations, and portions of the Aegis2 and WildGuard training subsets. We also open-sourced an evaluation harness that supports GLiClass and GLiNER2 backends as well as decoder-based models, and covers binary safety classification, multi-label categorization, toxicity, jailbreak detection, prompt safety, response safety, response refusal, and prompt subcategory views across public benchmark families. Across an expanded comparison spanning 12 safety-classification tasks and 17 category tasks against eight contemporary guardrail systems -- including both GLiNER2-based and generative guardrail models -- Opir variants are competitive on or ahead of the strongest open-weight baselines on the majority of benchmark datasets while operating with a substantially smaller deployment footprint.
Science Journals
arXiv:2602.22045v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We introduce DLT-Corpus, the largest domain-specific text collection for Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) research to date: 2.98 billion tokens from 22.12 million documents spanning scientific literature (37,440 publications), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents (49,023 filings), and social media (22 million posts). Existing Natural Language Processing (NLP) resources for DLT focus narrowly on cryptocurrency price prediction and smart contracts, leaving domain-specific language underexplored despite the sector's ~$3 trillion market capitalization and rapid technological evolution.
We demonstrate DLT-Corpus' utility by analyzing patterns of technology emergence and market-innovation correlations. Findings reveal that technologies first appear in our scientific literature subset before reaching patents and social media, following traditional technology transfer patterns. While social media sentiment remains overwhelmingly bullish even during crypto winters, scientific and patent activity grows less tied to short-term sentiment, tracking overall market expansion in a virtuous cycle in which research precedes and enables economic growth that, in turn, funds further innovation.
We release the DLT-Corpus and companion artifacts: LedgerBERT (+23% over BERT-base on DLT-specific Named Entity Recognition (NER) task), a sentiment analysis dataset of 23,301 crypto news headlines and descriptions, tools, and code.
arXiv:2605.30053v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Connected Submodular Maximization (CSM) is a graph problem with important applications to wireless network deployment, path planning, epidemic outbreaks, and cancer genome studies. In CSM, we are given a graph $G$, a non-negative monotone submodular function $f$ on subsets of the vertex set of $G$, and an integer $k$. The goal is to select a tree in $G$, with $k$ edges, whose vertex set maximizes $f$. We also study the more general Directed and Directed Rooted variants of CSM (DCSM and DRCSM respectively). In both variants, $G$ is directed and the solution must be an out-tree in $G$, with $k$ edges, whose vertex set maximizes $f$; DRCSM further specifies a vertex to be the root of the selected out-tree. For CSM, several previous works have proposed polynomial time approximation algorithms; the state-of-the-art polynomial time algorithm achieves a $\Omega(\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}})$-approximation. We can also parameterize the approximation factor by the radius of the optimal solution, denoted by $r$; the state-of-the-art polynomial time algorithm achieves a $\Omega(\frac{1}{r})$-approximation. In this paper, we improve on the state-of-the-art approximation factor for CSM with respect to $r$ as well as $k$, noting that $r \leq k$. We propose a polynomial time framework that, for (Directed) CSM, achieves a $\Omega(\frac{\varepsilon^{3}}{{r}^{\varepsilon}})$-approximation for every constant $\varepsilon \in (0, 1]$. For DRCSM, our framework achieves a $\Omega(\frac{\delta \varepsilon^{3}}{{r}^{\varepsilon}})$-approximation that violates the size constraint by at most a factor of $1 + \delta$ for every $\delta \in [\frac{1}{k}, 1]$. A key component of our framework is GreedyRadius, which is an algorithm for DRCSM that takes another algorithm with a bicriteria approximation factor in terms of $k$ and outputs a solution with the same bicriteria approximation factor (up to constants) in terms of $r$.
arXiv:2605.29232v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Scaling a Search Conversion Rate (CVR) prediction model, especially in high-traffic environments, presents a challenge: superior model quality needs to be balanced with strict constraints on training cost and serving latency. This paper details an effective approach for scaling modern search CVR prediction models. We begin with an empirical study to understand the scaling performance of search CVR models, analyzing how quality improves as we scale three key factors of model backbone computation, the size of embedding parameters, and the volume of training data.
We use a large-scale production dataset, comprising over a year of customer interaction logs from a high-traffic e-commerce platform, to evaluate the scalability of several state-of-the-art architectures and their ensembles. Our key findings are: (1) selecting the right backbone and scaling factors is crucial; (2) the impact of scaling backbone, embedding, and data is largely independent and additive, which has implications for more efficient scaling exploration; (3) a streamlined warmstart strategy can accelerate training iterations while simplifying new updates; (4) inference optimization strategies such as decoupled graph execution and dynamic batching can enable low-latency GPU serving even for high-capacity models. Compared to a baseline of a pre-scaling production model, we ultimately deployed a model trained on 2.5x larger training data with 8x more inference compute while having minimal latency impact. Online A/B tests also demonstrate that our launches achieved a combined +2.6% gain in a key metric of search conversion rate.
arXiv:2605.30058v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While LLM agents have demonstrated remarkable task-oriented abilities such as planning, reasoning, and action, few works have treated them as complete human personalities where emotional dimensions hold equal importance. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark to systematically assess whether LLM agents can simulate coherent, human-like psychology. Specifically, our benchmark constructs 11 diverse human characters grounded in orthogonal Big Five personality traits, with each profile deeply integrated with 1,000 structured autobiographical-style episodic memories distributed across theory-grounded developmental life stages. To rigorously evaluate the psychological manifestations of LLMs, we designed a curated suite of 64 decision-making scenarios, guided by the DIAMONDS taxonomy, a psychological framework that characterizes situations along eight dimensions: Duty, Intellect, Adversity, Mating, pOsitivity, Negativity, Deception, and Sociality. By subjecting agents to varying scenarios, the benchmark evaluates whether they can consolidate their innate personality traits and autobiographical memories to make behavioral decisions that are consistent with their specific psychological profiles. After systematic human validation and filtering, we obtained a benchmark consisting of 673 multiple-choice questions (MCQs). We believe this benchmark provides a principled and scalable testbed for studying human-like emotions, personality consistency, and value-consistent behavioural decision-making in LLM-based agents.
arXiv:2605.29340v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this paper, we discuss question-answer dataset for LLM safety evaluation, with a focus on illegal activities. Specifically, on the basis of manual analysis of AnswerCarefully, we introduce several additional information, methods for creating question-answer examples, and a rubric for evaluating LLM-generated responses. The outcomes of this study are intended to be shared with the "JAI-Trust" project.
arXiv:2603.07860v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Pretrained diffusion models are effective priors for Bayesian inverse problems, but posterior sampling with these priors is often costly because data-consistency guidance is applied throughout the full reverse trajectory. Existing methods have shown that vector-Jacobian products through the denoiser can sometimes be avoided, yet they typically still rely on dense guidance through the full trajectory or expensive inner solves. We introduce Sparse Scheduled Diffusion Guidance for Inverse Problems (Spin), a solver that avoids starting posterior sampling from pure noise. Spin first samples from a posterior time-marginal at an intermediate timestep $t_*$, and then uses that state as a warm start for a guided reverse diffusion process. At guidance time, instead of enforcing the measurement constraint at every denoising step, Spin applies lightweight corrections only at scheduled timesteps where the denoiser can still clean up artifacts. The resulting procedure decouples prior refinement from data consistency: the prior supplies denoising, while lightweight pixel-space optimization enforces the measurement constraint without backpropagation through the denoiser or decoder. Across linear and nonlinear inverse problems on FFHQ and ImageNet, Spin achieves competitive reconstruction quality with a substantially better runtime--memory profile, running 2x faster on pixel-space models and up to 50x faster on latent diffusion models, with lower memory costs.
arXiv:2605.30070v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Moving beyond simple scalar rewards toward richer world feedback is a natural path to more scalable RL post-training. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is a promising recent approach that uses arbitrary feedback as learning signal, yet its reliability compared to established methods, such as GRPO, remains unclear. We identify a strikingly consistent linear correlation between the initial student-self-teacher performance gap and the final performance improvement in OPSD. This relationship holds across context types and model families, providing a powerful predictive law for anticipating the outcome of an OPSD configuration without running the full training procedure. Interestingly, we show that this linear predictability holds with model scale, suggesting a potential basis for new empirical scaling laws on larger models with stronger in-context learning capabilities. In essence, our findings show that OPSD performance can be predicted and tuned before training, offering a principled way to incorporate world feedback as a first-class component of the post-training pipeline.
arXiv:2605.28888v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Real-world user behavior rarely consists of isolated actions; instead, it often forms intent flows governed by spatiotemporal dependencies. To provide integrated service recommendations, we focus on the task of Generative Spatiotemporal Intent Sequence Recommendation (GSISR), which aims to generate intent sequences that are logically coherent and physically executable within complex spatiotemporal contexts. While LLMs offer strong reasoning potential for GSISR, direct industrial deployment is limited by high inference latency and context-mismatched or physically infeasible plans. To address these challenges, we propose a generative framework, GPlan, that internalizes LLM reasoning into lightweight models through two components. First, to enable reasoning under strict latency constraints, we introduce Progressive Implicit CoT Distillation, which compresses explicit reasoning processes into reserved latent tokens, allowing small models to inherit complex planning logic without generating long reasoning text. Second, to address the disconnect between general knowledge and real-world constraints, we design Spatiotemporal Counterfactual DPO. By aligning the model with counterfactual context-plan pairs, we improve sensitivity to spatiotemporal context and reduce context-mismatched plans. Offline experiments and online A/B testing demonstrate that our approach improves sequence coherence and context responsiveness. Our implementation and the anonymized GSISR dataset are available at https://github.com/alibaba/GPlan.
arXiv:2605.29114v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models with integrated reasoning have been proposed for end-to-end autonomous driving, assuming a tight coupling between reasoning and trajectory generation. However, the robustness of such systems under realistic input perturbations remains largely unexplored. We show that these models are highly vulnerable to realistic input perturbations, achieving up to 89% attack success rate (ASR) on reasoning and up to 72% on trajectory manipulation in closed-loop simulation, leading to increased collision rates and degraded safety metrics. Using NVIDIA's recent Alpamayo models as representative industry-developed VLAs, we conduct the first systematic black-box study of reasoning-enabled VLA models under realistic textual input corruptions, evaluating their impact on reasoning and driving behavior. We introduce a reasoning-aware evaluation framework capturing both semantic and structural aspects of reasoning, along with safety-centric measures. We also introduce a benchmark for evaluating attacks and defenses on reasoning-trajectory interactions in autonomous driving. Our results highlight the need for rigorous evaluation and improved defenses to ensure the safety of reasoning-enabled VLA systems in autonomous driving.
arXiv:2605.29798v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reliable identification of fracture origins in alumina matrix composite hip and knee implants is critical for quality assurance and patient safety, yet current fractographic workflows are time-consuming, partly subjective, and reliant on high-magnification scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We present an interpretable vision-transformer (ViT) workflow for automated classification of fracture causes in an alumina matrix composite (BIOLOX delta, CeramTec GmbH) widely used in total joint replacements. A dataset of 8,493 SEM images (50x-10,000x) was curated from five years of in-production burst and proof tests and annotated into three defect categories defined along the manufacturing chain: green body, hard machining, and material defects. Under severe class imbalance, the fine-tuned ViT reached an accuracy of 0.907 and a macro-F1 of 0.888 in stratified five-fold cross-validation, with a two-stage perceptual-hash/SSIM leakage audit confirming negligible specimen overlap. Notably, performance at low magnification (50x) was comparable to that at high magnification (1k-10kx), indicating that macro-scale features - mirror geometry and hackle line fields - already encode sufficient diagnostic signal. Grad-CAM attributions consistently localised on canonical fractographic cues (mirrors, hackles, pores, machining marks), aligning with established fractographic criteria. Together, these results position interpretable ViTs as a complementary tool for ceramic-implant quality assurance, enabling low-magnification pre-screening and reducing reliance on time-intensive high-magnification inspection.
arXiv:2605.29560v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Parameterizing high-fidelity "digital twins" of batteries is a critical yet challenging inverse problem that hinders the pace of battery innovation. Prevailing methods formulate this as a black-box optimization (BBO) task, employing algorithms that are sample-inefficient and blind to the underlying physics. In this work, we introduce a new paradigm that reframes the inverse problem as a reasoning task, and present Battery-Sim-Agent, the first framework to deploy a Large Language Model (LLM) agent in a closed loop with a high-fidelity battery simulator. The agent mimics a human scientist's workflow: it interprets rich, multi-modal feedback from the simulator, forms physically-grounded hypotheses to explain discrepancies, and proposes structured parameter updates. On a systematically constructed benchmark suite spanning diverse battery chemistries, operating conditions, and difficulty levels, our agent significantly outperforms strong BBO baselines like Bayesian optimization in identifying accurate parameters. We further demonstrate the framework's capability in complex long-horizon degradation fitting tasks and validate its practical applicability on real-world battery datasets. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-agents as reasoning-based optimizers for scientific discovery and battery parameter estimation.
arXiv:2605.29587v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: In transcriptomics, gene-set-aware factorization methods such as the Pathway Level Information Extractor (PLIER) are most effective when trained on large, heterogeneous expression compendia. Yet, many clinically relevant cohorts cannot be pooled into a single dataset due to privacy and governance constraints. We present FPLIER, a federated extension of PLIER that enables distributed training across multiple data holders while incorporating publicly available datasets. Through secure aggregation, FPLIER produces training updates algebraically equivalent to those of a centralized pooled-data approach while keeping expression data local. We evaluate FPLIER across multiple scenarios in two simulated consortia (from the K-CLIER and MultiPLIER studies) and demonstrate stable convergence. We further conduct a systematic analysis of membership inference attacks targeting both intermediate training statistics and the released model. Our results show that privacy risk is governed by the rank of the training expression matrix. Incorporating public data or reducing data dimensionality increases this rank, moving the system toward a full-rank regime in which training and non-training samples become indistinguishable to the attacker, and membership-inference performance approaches random guessing.
arXiv:2603.14026v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: This work establishes the well-posedness and a priori error analysis for the mixed FEEC-type finite element approximation of the three-dimensional vector Laplace boundary value problem subject to the Dirichlet boundary condition. The Dirichlet condition disrupts the structure of the standard de Rham complex, requiring the vorticity to be sought in a non-standard function space to achieve well-posedness. We derive error estimates that confirm the numerically observed suboptimal convergence rates. In particular, by developing a discrete Caccioppoli-type inequality for discrete curl-harmonic functions, we prove $(k-1/2)$-th order convergence in the energy norm on general domains and $k$-th order convergence in $L^2$ on convex domains, where $k \ge 1$ denotes polynomial degree of the finite element spaces. These results extend the previous two-dimensional analysis developed in [Arnold, D.N., Falk, R.S. and Gopalakrishnan, J., 2012. Mixed finite element approximation of the vector Laplacian with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(9), p.1250024.]~to three-dimensional domains with general topology. As a direct application, a discretization of the Stokes problem in vorticity-velocity-pressure form is studied.
arXiv:2605.27755v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: In this paper, we present an open-source measurement platform designed to characterize the performance of commercial cellular (Verizon, a major US provider) and LEO satellite (Starlink) networks through real-world flight tests in rural environments. We implement a comprehensive multi-layer measurement approach spanning physical layer signal metrics, multi-cell network topology, and end-to-end (E2E) application performance. Through an extensive flight campaign with more than $10$ flight tests, $4.5$+ hours of flight time resulting in more than $18$K samples, we present the first detailed, open-source dataset analyzing dual cellular and Starlink performance for low-altitude UAV operations. Our cellular-Starlink comparative results, which are collected \emph{simultaneously at the same time and location}, demonstrate significant performance differences between the two technologies: the LEO satellite link achieves superior latency performance with $95\%$ of Round-Trip Time (RTT) measurements below $50$ ms compared to $80\%$ under $150$ ms for cellular, and exceptional downlink capacity with $95\%$ exceeding $25$ Mbps versus only $5$ Mbps for cellular. Our analysis on cellular network performance demonstrates that while higher altitudes (e.g., $330+$ m above the sea level) improve signal power by $15-20$ dB via line-of-sight (LOS) propagation, it causes a $3-4$ $\times$ increase in handover rates, which is due to excessive multi-cell visibility rather than signal degradation. Furthermore, we observe asymmetric impacts on the RTT performance due to handovers such that $53.5$\% of handovers improve RTT, but worst-case degradation ($275$ ms) is $2$ $\times$ larger than best-case improvement ($137$ ms).
arXiv:2605.29454v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) are the prevailing method for identifying training data, their application has expanded into privacy auditing and machine unlearning. Nevertheless, the field lacks a systematic framework for evaluating how different contexts affect MIA efficacy. Without such a characterization, practitioners risk deploying algorithms that perform well on benchmarks but become statistically irrelevant when faced with the nuances of specific, real-world datasets. To bridge this gap and provide actionable insights, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework that systematically characterizes privacy risks across the entire machine learning pipeline, spanning data, architectures, algorithms, and post-training modules. Designed to inherently capture diverse operational contexts, our framework rigorously evaluates state-of-the-art MIAs across a broad spectrum of training configurations. To account for varying misclassification costs in real-world deployments, we employ three complementary metrics: Balanced Accuracy for symmetric costs, alongside TPR at low FPR (or TNR at low FNR) for asymmetric scenarios where false alarms or missed detections are strictly penalized. Furthermore, recognizing that existing MIAs assume divergent adversary capabilities, we formalize two standardized threat models and adapt these attacks into corresponding variants to ensure an equitable benchmark. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that the efficacy of specific MIA methodologies is highly sensitive to the assumed threat models and chosen evaluation metrics. Ultimately, we distill these findings into actionable guidelines and provide a ready-to-use auditing toolkit, empowering practitioners to conduct better privacy assessments.
arXiv:2605.29420v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Persona prompting is widely used to steer large language models, yet its practical value remains unclear. Prior work often evaluates persona prompting using aggregate scores, making it difficult to determine whether expert-role prompting consistently improves response quality or instead changes responses along different quality dimensions. We study this question through a controlled comparison of four prompting conditions across 1,140 open-ended questions spanning 38 expert roles and six domains: no role prompt, a generic domain-expert prompt, embedding-based role retrieval, and a hybrid retrieval method combining embedding search with LLM-based role selection. Aggregate results show only small overall differences between conditions. However, metric-level analysis reveals a consistent tradeoff that aggregate averages obscure: role prompting systematically increases expertise depth while reducing clarity. These effects are highly conditional rather than universal. Role prompting performs best on advisory questions and in domains such as medicine and psychology, where structured expert framing and risk communication are intrinsically valuable. In contrast, baseline prompting performs better on conceptual and explanatory questions in finance, legal, science, and technology domains, where concise plain-language explanation is more important. We further show that hybrid retrieval significantly improves over embedding-only role selection, although better role retrieval does not eliminate the broader expertise-depth versus clarity tradeoff. Overall, our findings suggest that persona prompting primarily reshapes response characteristics rather than broadly improving capability, and that multi-metric evaluation is necessary for understanding its effects.
arXiv:2503.08793v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We demonstrate that a symmetry of the local gyrokinetic model is broken when the safety factor q is almost (but not exactly) a rational number and magnetic shear is $\hat{s} \approx 0$. Tokamaks with such a q profile will spontaneously rotate due to turbulent momentum transport. Nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations indicate this mechanism is significantly stronger than all other drives of intrinsic rotation. It also generates intrinsic electric current that pulls q towards rational values, potentially aiding non-inductive current drive. This is likely important in the triggering of internal transport barriers.
arXiv:2605.30085v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language model reasoning traces are rarely all-or-nothing; they frequently contain valid intermediate steps before a critical error occurs. Existing uncertainty quantification methods typically certify final answers or entire responses, failing to provide statistical guarantees for the proportion of a sequential trace that can be safely retained. To address this, we introduce CROP (Conformal Reasoning Output Prefixes), a verifier-agnostic calibration procedure for clean-prefix certification. Given any step-level risk proxy, CROP selects a calibrated threshold and returns the longest contiguous prefix whose step risk proxies remain below it, routing the uncertified suffix for downstream review or repair. Assuming exchangeability, CROP rigorously controls the marginal probability that the returned prefix contains an annotated error. Across six process-labeled reasoning datasets, we demonstrate that standard step-level metrics such as AUROC do not fully capture prefix utility, suggesting verifiers should instead be evaluated by certified prefix length. Furthermore, CROP balances over- and under-withholding, improving downstream repair accuracy by preserving valid intermediate reasoning while discarding misleading suffixes. Ultimately, this work positions prefix certification as a rigorous, practical bridge between process supervision, abstention, and repair.
arXiv:2604.13019v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Computer Use Agents (CUAs) fundamentally rely on graphical user interface (GUI) grounding to translate language instructions into executable screen actions, but editing-level grounding in dense coding interfaces (such as VS Code and Cursor), where sub-pixel accuracy is required to interact with dense IDE elements, remains underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on single-shot coordinate prediction, which lacks a mechanism for error correction and often fails in high-density interfaces. In this technical report, we conduct an empirical study of pixel-precise cursor localization in coding environments. Instead of a single-step execution, our agent engages in an iterative refinement process, utilizing visual feedback from previous attempts to reach the target element. This closed-loop grounding mechanism allows the agent to self-correct displacement errors and adapt to dynamic UI changes. We evaluate our approach across Claude, Qwen, and GPT on a suite of complex coding benchmarks, demonstrating that multi-turn refinement significantly outperforms state-of-the-art single-shot models in both click precision and overall task success rate. Our results suggest that iterative visual reasoning is a critical component for the next generation of reliable software engineering agents. Code: https://github.com/microsoft/precision-cua-bench/tree/main.
arXiv:2605.30207v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The same prompt -- "best CRM software" -- reaches AI assistants from buyers in widely different contexts: a solo founder, an enterprise VP, a UK SMB owner. We audit how strongly that contextual variation reshapes which brands the model recommends. The audit samples 2,000 runs over a design space of 10 personas x 8 prompts x 3 model configurations x N=10 reps, with the two OpenAI cells at full 8-prompt coverage and the Anthropic sonnet-4.6 / low cell at 4-prompt coverage. Prefixing the user message with a persona drops the recommendation-set similarity (Jaccard) by Delta = -0.12 to -0.20 relative to a same-persona baseline (clustered 95% CIs exclude zero on all three measured cells; the sonnet cell's CI rests on only 4 prompt clusters and is correspondingly wider). The effect is sharply prominence-stratified: category leaders are persona-resistant (~80% same-brand consistency across personas), but mid-market brands swap up to 75% of the recommendation set as the persona changes. The Anthropic model shows a larger point-estimate effect than the OpenAI configurations, though clustered CIs overlap for the closer contrast (sonnet vs. OpenAI/high); the asymmetry is consistent with Anthropic's more retrieval-unattributed generation route (43-52% recommendations without observed retrieval-layer evidence, vs OpenAI's 8-29%, documented in Jack 2026). Any measurement of AI brand perception must condition on the buyer persona supplying the query: the same prompt produces materially different recommendation sets depending on who the model thinks is asking, and a measurement protocol that aggregates across personas systematically obscures that variation. The effect concentrates at mid-market and is largest on the most priors-reliant generation route in our audit, consistent with persona responsiveness growing as models lean more on training-data priors and richer context integration.
arXiv:2605.29893v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving complex tasks through multi-step reasoning and tool use. However, existing evaluation protocols primarily focus on task success, overlooking a critical aspect of agent behavior: execution efficiency. In practice, agent trajectories often contain redundant steps that consume substantial resources while contributing little to task completion. In this work, we propose and formulate a new research area: \textbf{redundant step detection} for agent trajectories. To support this initiative, we introduce \textbf{RedundancyBench}, a new benchmark that contains diverse tasks with carefully annotated trajectories, where each step is labeled according to its contribution to task completion. Using RedundancyBench, we develop and evaluate 3 representative methods to answer whether a step within trajectory is redundant or necessary. Our results show that even the best-performing method achieves only 24.88\% score in detecting redundant steps, while some methods perform worse than random guessing. These results highlight the task's complexity and the need for further research in this area. \footnote{Code and dataset in this paper are both available in \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RedundancyBench}{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RedundancyBench}.}
arXiv:2605.28913v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) often generate extensive chain-of-thought (CoT) traces before producing a final answer. As explicit textual artifacts, these traces can be passed to other models to solve the same task, enabling cross-model reasoning transfer. Yet successful transfer alone does not reveal how the provided CoT contributes to another model's answer. We study this question with a controlled provider--receiver framework, where a provider generates a reasoning trace and a receiver solves the same problem from increasingly longer trace prefixes. We compare force-answer, where the receiver answers directly from the prefix, with free-generation, where it may continue reasoning before answering. Across models and benchmarks, full traces often transfer successfully, but prefix trajectories reveal distinct mechanisms. In force-answer mode, AIME transfer is largely driven by explicit answer availability. MMLU-Pro instead reflects a larger role for receiver competence, while ZebraLogic depends on partial structured-answer information rather than complete-answer leakage alone. In free-generation mode, partial CoTs improve performance across benchmarks, indicating that prefixes can guide continued reasoning. Finally, answer agreement among receivers provides a gold-free signal for stopping provider reasoning early. Overall, cross-model CoT transfer is not a single phenomenon: it can reflect answer extraction, reasoning scaffolding, or receiver-dependent competence.
arXiv:2605.29556v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Building mathematical optimization models is critical in operations research (OR), while it requires substantial human expertise. Recent advancements have utilized large language models (LLMs) to automate this modeling process. However, existing works often struggle to verify the correctness of the generated optimization models, without checking the rationality of the constraints and variables or the validity of solutions to the generated models. This hampers the subsequent verification and correction steps, and thus it severely hurts the modeling accuracy. To address this challenge, we propose a novel LLM-based framework with Dual-side Verification (Opt-Verifier) from both structure and solution perspectives, thereby improving the modeling accuracy. The structure-side verification ensures that the modeling structure of the generated optimization models aligns with the original problem description, accurately capturing the problem's constraints and requirements. Meanwhile, the solution-side verification interprets and evaluates the solutions' validity, confirming that the optimization models are logically and mathematically sound. Experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves over 20\% improvement in accuracy.
arXiv:2605.30135v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Various algorithms have been proposed to address the challenges posed by class-imbalanced learning from real-world data with long-tailed distributions. While these algorithms reduce prediction bias through rebalancing techniques, they often introduce increased prediction variance as a trade-off. Several multi-expert learning algorithms aim to address this variance but involve complex procedures. We propose a new multi-expert learning algorithm, called the dual-axis multi-expert learning (DAMEL), which reduces both bias and variance of predictions by using multiple experts along both representation and time axes. Along the representation axis, DAMEL concatenates the representations of multiple experts and trains an auxiliary balanced classifier simultaneously with the concatenated representations. Along the time axis, DAMEL aggregates network weights across training epochs, employing these aggregated weights during testing. Experimental results demonstrate that DAMEL reduces both bias and variance of predictions, highlighting its effectiveness in class-imbalanced learning.