Star measurements have a hidden accuracy problem, study finds
Astronomers testing five different methods to measure star properties found surprisingly large disagreements — gaps three times bigger than scientists' stated error margins. The discovery matters because thousands of exoplanet discoveries and space missions depend on these stellar measurements being trustworthy.
Originaltitel: gr8stars II: judgement day for spectroscopic parameter model systematics
<p>Many areas of astrophysics, including exoplanetary studies, rely on precise and accurate stellar parameters. This demands that uncertainties on these parameters truly reflect all biases and systematics. Within this second work of the gr8stars collaboration, we take a set of 585 bright FGK type dwarfs with high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio spectra from the SOPHIE (Spectrographe pour l'Observation desPh & eacute;nom & eacute;nes des Int & eacute;rieurs stellaires et des Exoplan & egrave;tes) spectrograph. We determine stellar effective temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity using five different spectroscopic methods for each star, with an additional method used for comparisons. We find a typical scatter of 76 K in T-eff, 0.14 dex in log g, and 0.07 dex in [Fe/H]. These deviations are significantly larger than the average precision error on these parameters. We furthermore use isochrone fitting to determine mass, radius, and age for all 585 stars, using input from all results. We use the radii determined by SED (Spectral Energy Distribution) fitting in the first gr8stars paper as a comparison to our isochronal radii from this work, in addition to comparing the isochronal log g to spectroscopic log g. The scatter in mass and radius from the use of different spectroscopic methods is investigated and propagated to exoplanetary parameters. The induced fractional uncertainties in planetary radius (less than or similar to 3 per cent) and mass (less than or similar to 5 per cent) are found to be below those typically found in the literature. We estimate a lower limit on planetary equilibrium temperature fractional uncertainty of $\approx$ 4 per cent, a noise floor that is currently not sufficiently represented in the literature.</p>