Data sharing mandates cost far more than funders expect, study finds
Research shows that preparing, storing, and managing shared biomedical data consumes roughly 20% of research budgets—a hidden cost most grant agencies don't adequately fund. The finding has immediate implications for how research institutions, funders, and companies budget for compliance with increasingly strict data-sharing requirements across the US and EU.
Originaltitel: The true costs of data management in the era of data sharing mandates.
Datadelning blir tvingande — men kostnaderna är dolda. Amerikanska och europeiska finansiärer kräver nu att forskare delar data, men förberedelse, lagring och kuratoring kan sluka cirka 20 procent av en forskningsprojekts driftbudget. Det framgår ur en analys från UCSF:s neurkirurgiska centrum, som kartlagt faktiska kostnader för datamaintenance och delning i federerade miljöer. Studien visar att återvinningen är substantiell — specialiserade databaser genererar anslaget mellan 2700 och 6500 procent avkastning räknat från initiala förvärvskostnader. För AI-produktchefer och investerare i deeptech innebär detta att budgetering för datakuratorer, informationsteknik och långsiktig lagring måste in redan i planeringsfasen. Utan rätt kompetens och finansiering blir mandaten ineffektiva. Framtida leverantörsval bör därför väga in mognadsnivå på datainfrastruktur som kritiskt urvalskriterium.
INTRODUCTION: United States (US) and European Union (EU) funders mandate data sharing, joining publishers with deposition requirements. Although funders require data sharing and curation plans be included in grant budgets, costs are difficult to forecast and there is pressing need for guidance. METHODS: We estimated costs of data maintenance, ongoing curation, and consultation for shared data from several major US and EU initiatives, providing benchmarks to help researchers, clinicians, administrators, and governmental agencies better forecast hidden costs of biomedical data sharing. RESULTS: We observe that costs to prepare, deposit, and share data in dynamic, federated environments, may subsume approximately 20% of a traditional operational research budget. The value of sharing these data for secondary analyses and validation/replication is substantial, but difficult to precisely estimate. One estimate suggests that the return on investment of specialized repositories ranges from 2700% to 6500%, measured by the initial cost to acquire their data holdings. CONCLUSIONS: Academic cultivation and advancement across the range of professionals and their diverse data acquisition, curation, and maintenance skillsets is essential. Close partnership between research community stakeholders paired with government mandates and funding to support data management and sharing standards can facilitate accurate and efficient translation of knowledge into clinical practice.