Forskningsradar
← Life Sciences
Life Sciences 4.0

Low-Tech Neck Exercises Beat High-Tech Support for Whiplash Dizziness

A major clinical trial found that whiplash patients recover equally well from dizziness whether they attend frequent physiotherapy sessions or do exercises at home with minimal online support. The finding could reshape how insurers and employers manage post-injury rehabilitation costs, potentially saving millions in unnecessary clinical visits without compromising patient outcomes.

Originaltitel: Effectiveness of neck-specific exercises with and without internet-based support on dizziness/unsteadiness in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial

Abstrakt

<p>Aim</p><p>To investigate the effectiveness in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) of neck-specific exercise (NSE) supervised by a physiotherapist twice a week for 12 weeks versus neck-specific exercise with internet support and four physiotherapy visits (NSEIT) regarding dizziness, unsteadiness and balance, and to investigate the differences between WAD grades.</p><p>Method</p><p>This is a secondary analysis of a prospective randomised multicentre study (RCT) with concealed allocation (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812). The outcomes were dizziness measured on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI); dizziness at rest and during activity and unsteadiness using visual analogue scales; and standing on one leg with eyes closed (SOLEC). Participants (n = 140) were randomised to NSE or NSEIT. Measurements were obtained at baseline, and at three- and 15-month follow-ups by assessor-blinded investigators.</p><p>Results</p><p>There were no significant differences between NSEIT and NSE in any of the outcomes (p&gt;0.38). Both NSEIT and NSE improved over time (p&lt;0.02; effect size (ES) = 0.74–1.01) in DHI score and dizziness during activity. There was a significant group-by-time interaction effect in dizziness (at rest: p = 0.035; ES: 0.66; and during activity: p = 0.016; ES: 1.24) between WAD grades. Individuals with WAD grade 3 had dizziness/unsteadiness to a greater extent and improved in all outcomes over time (p&lt;0.04) compared to those with WAD grade 2, except for SOLEC.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>There were no significant group differences between NSEIT and NSE. Both groups decreased in terms of self-reported dizziness (DHI, dizziness during activity), with medium to large effect size. Those with WAD grade 3 have dizziness/unsteadiness to a greater extent than those with WAD grade 2. Despite improvements, many participants still reported dizziness at 15-month follow-up, and additional balance training and/or vestibular exercise may be investigated for potential additional effect.</p>

Generera ett redaktionellt utkast på svenska