Forskningsradar
← Hälsa & medicin
Hälsa & medicin 3.7

Simple Device Could Transform How Doctors Measure Children's Body Composition

Researchers have developed the first validated equation for using a handheld bioimpedance device to accurately measure muscle and fat in young children—a breakthrough that could streamline pediatric health screening and nutrition assessment. The finding opens a path to faster, cheaper body composition testing in clinical settings and schools where traditional imaging is impractical.

Originaltitel: Prediction of fat-free mass in young children using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy

Abstrakt

<p>BACKGROUND: Bioimpedance devices are practical for measuring body composition in preschool children, but their application is limited by the lack of validated equations.</p><p>OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate fat-free mass (FFM) bioimpedance prediction equations among New Zealand 3.5-year olds, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method.</p><p>METHODS: Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (SFB7, ImpediMed) and DXA (iDXA, GE Lunar) measurements were conducted on 65 children. An equation incorporating weight, sex, ethnicity, and impedance was developed and validated. Performance was compared with published equations and mixture theory prediction.</p><p>RESULTS: The equation developed in similar to 70% (n = 45) of the population (FFM [kg] = 1.39 + 0.30 weight [kg] + 0.39 length(2)/ resistance at 50 kHz [cm(2)/Omega] + 0.30 sex [M = 1/F = 0] + 0.28 ethnicity [1 = Asian/0 = non-Asian]) explained 88% of the variance in FFM and predicted FFM with a root mean squared error of 0.39 kg (3.4% of mean FFM). When internally validated (n = 20), bias was small (40 g, 0.3% of mean FFM), with limits of agreement (LOA) +/- 7.6% of mean FFM (95% LOA: -0.82, 0.90 kg). Published equations evaluated had similar LOA, but with marked bias (&gt;12.5% of mean FFM) when validated in our cohort, likely due to DXA differences. Of mixture theory methods assessed, the SFB7 inbuilt equation with personalized body geometry values performed best. However, bias and LOA were larger than with the empirical equations (-0.43 kg [95% LOA: -1.65, 0.79], p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a bioimpedance equation that can accurately predict FFM. Further external validation of the equation is required.</p>

Generera ett redaktionellt utkast på svenska