Nurses flag ethical minefield in organ donation from dead patients
A Swedish study of intensive care nurses reveals deep ethical conflicts when switching patients from life-saving treatment to organ donation protocols. The findings expose gaps in how hospitals manage these transitions—a critical issue as more healthcare systems adopt donation after circulatory death to boost organ supply.
Originaltitel: Navigating ethical challenges in donation after circulatory death: Nurses' perspectives
<p>Background: Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death (cDCD) offers new opportunities but also new, demanding ethical challenges in the field of organ donation. The process requires navigating boundaries due to the transition from intensive care and life-sustaining treatment to the end-of-life care and a possible cDCD process. Previous research has mainly focused on medical aspects, leaving a gap regarding intensive care nurses' and their reflections of possible, ethical challenges during the cDCD process.</p><p>Aim: To explore ethical challenges intensive care nurses encounter when navigating life-sustaining treatment, its withdrawal, and potential organ donation in cDCD.</p><p>Research design: A qualitative design with an inductive approach was applied using Critical Incident Technique.</p><p>Participants and research context: The study was conducted at two Swedish ICUs and included multiple scenarios when cDCD was managed after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Five experienced intensive care nurses were interviewed, yielding 142 critical incidents for analysis.</p><p>Ethical considerations: The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and Swedish law on ethical vetting. Approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (ref. 2017/1722-31-1).</p><p>Results: Five themes were identified: (1) Navigating Ethical Boundaries in End-of-Life Care and cDCD, (2) Safeguarding Autonomy in cDCD Decisions, (3) Balancing Emotional Presence and Ethical Practice, (4) Managing Ethical Uncertainty Through Knowledge and Team Support, and (5) Ensuring Ethical Responsibility Through Interprofessional Communication. Ethical challenges were linked to unclear procedures, limited training, and fragmented communication, while structured guidelines and collegial support enabled ethical coherence.</p><p>Conclusions: cDCD requires continuous negotiation between ethical-, professional-, and emotional dimensions. To ensure ethically sustainable practice, organisations need to strengthen ethical awareness, structured training, and interprofessional communication. Integrating both biomedical principles and caring ethics is crucial to safeguard patient autonomy, support relatives, and enabling healthcare professionals to act with confidence during end-of-life care and organ donation.</p>