6G's hidden surveillance risk: Tech fixes won't stop privacy breaches
Next-generation wireless networks will blanket cities in continuous biometric sensors, but telecom standards rely on encryption alone—leaving massive legal and ethical gaps. Researchers say regulators must mandate oversight of AI systems that interpret this data or face conflicts with EU privacy laws.
Originaltitel: Unconsented Sensing: A Sociotechnical Governance Framework for 6G ISAC
The forthcoming deployment of 6G Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) will transform cellular infrastructure into pervasive, continuous environmental and biometric sensing grids. While current telecom standardization efforts (e.g., 3GPP, ETSI) have formally recognized privacy and trustworthiness as critical pillars for 6G, their proposed mitigations remain overwhelmingly technocentric, relying on cryptographic anonymization and physical layer security. This approach critically underestimates the sociotechnical and legal complexities of the downstream machine learning (ML) models required to interpret raw sensing data, creating a profound collision with existing digital rights legislation. This position paper argues that technical security is insufficient. ISAC trustworthiness must be redefined as mandatory regulatory and sociotechnical compliance. We identify the specific legal friction points between continuous ISAC surveillance and the mandates of emerging global digital rights regimes, using the stringent requirements of the EU AI Act and GDPR as our primary regulatory baselines. To bridge this gap, we propose a governance framework centered on three pillars: Purpose-bound sensing activation, citizen transparency mechanisms, and algorithmic accountability for ISAC-driven ML models. Ultimately, this paper provides a regulatory roadmap to prevent the illegal deployment of 6G sensing infrastructures and ensure they remain viable before physical deployment.