Clinical trials of psychedelic drugs surge, but focus narrowly on safety
Researchers mapped 26 registered clinical trials of ayahuasca and DMT, finding explosive growth since 2020 but revealing a cautious approach: most trials exclude patients with psychiatric or heart conditions and prioritize acute safety over efficacy. The pattern suggests a field still proving it can be done safely before proving it works.
Originaltitel: Registered Clinical Trials of Ayahuasca and <scp>DMT</scp> : A Scoping Review
Interest in ayahuasca and its main component, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), has currently moved from historical and experimental use into modern clinical development. Yet, current evidence is fragmented, and systematic mapping of trial methods and design choices remains limited. We therefore systematically examined registered interventional trials of DMT, ayahuasca, and DMT combined with harmine on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifying 26 eligible trial registers for review. We extracted and harmonized trial characteristics, participant eligibility and enrollment patterns, design features, administration routes, and registered outcomes, and linked completed registrations to associated publications. The registry landscape expanded after 2020-2021 and was dominated by early-stage development, with most trials in phase I and more than half listed as completed at the time of extraction. Trials were primarily DMT-only and most often sponsored by academic or hospital institutions. Eligibility criteria were conservative, emphasizing medically and psychiatrically healthy adult cohorts and extensive cardiovascular and psychiatric exclusions. Accordingly, primary outcomes prioritized acute safety and physiological monitoring, alongside structured characterization of the subjective and altered-states profile, while disorder-specific symptom endpoints were less commonly prioritized as primary objectives. Publications linked to included trials largely reflect this early-stage focus, describing controlled administration, tolerability limits, route and formulation refinement, and initial mechanistic readouts. A smaller set of publications from depression-focused trials provides preliminary evidence of potential clinical effects, supporting further controlled replication and broader disorder-focused development. Overall, registered trials indicate an active and maturing field that has generated foundational safety and regimen knowledge, but remains constrained by a limited number of indication-specific programs beyond depression.